Sebelius' office admits state was slow to ask for payment for Tiller reception

Is the K.S. administration a partial birth administration, or a late term abortion?

Either way, it seems to be falling apart as she focuses her attention on things that have nothing to do with her current job...

Does anyone besides the pro-life community smell the stench of a cover-up here?

How many "coincidences" do we need to see before the Kansas City Star folds from lack of credibility?

If this newspaper was run by real editors, they would have pilloried Sebelius over paying this bill only AFTER they learned it was going public.

Here's the REAL scoop: Bob Novak and other conservatives started making inquiries into this scandal, and the Sebelius staff learned of it. So they immediately covered their tracks, paid the bill, and called their friends at the Kansas City Star, like Barb Shelly, to write defensive editorials while the governess ducks for cover.

Of course, the Kansas City Star couldn't be more compromised...after all, the entire editorial board danced in a conga line with Planned Parenthood CEO Peter Brownlie leading the way, during Sebelius' birthday party last year. Don't believe me, though, read it for yourself:

http://www.ppkm.org/PDFs/ri_summer_07.pdf

There is another transaction that Sebelius needs to back date in order to cover the "Gee George Tiller Owns my State Ball."
If Tiller paid $2500 for the auction bid and the food and drink only cost $848, then The Greater Kansas City Women's Political Caucus needs a notation for a donation from Tiller of $1652 in their campaign finance disclosures.
Fortunately, Planned Parenthood is sponsoring a seminar entitled "How to Back Date Documents Without a Computer or Copier." this upcoming Saturday.
Back dating documents in Kansas is not a problem though there will be consequences. The Star will publish another 3 or 4 editorials attacking Phill Kline. The Kansas Department of Health and Environment will refuse to allow investigators to view the disposable paper from the Tiller Party in order to protect Kansans from toxic waste. Paul Morrison will sue Johns Hopkins and Dr. McHugh for using mind control to trick him into spying on the Planned Parenthood investigation. The Kansas Supreme Court will seal the State of Kansas. Steve Rose will claim that there is not a shred of evidence that George Tiller even exists.

-and young women will continue to travel to Kansas for late term abortions on viable infants that are illegal everywhere else in the civilized world.

Good link and writing on Kansas Abortion here
http://www.worldontheweb.com/2008/06/02/the-killing-fields-of-kansas/

Jeffrey

Did Gov. Kathleen Sebelius violate Kansas ethics laws by donating auction items and not reporting them?

http://kansasmeadowlark.com/2008/06/03/did-sebelius-violate-ethics/

Thanks Meadowlark for the excellent analysis, you are the best at shedding light on the Kansas Abortion Industry’s labyrinthine cess pool of campaign finance deception.
Am I not correct that you produced a copy of a ProKanDo fundraising letter put out in the final days of the 2006 election, where the PAC asked donors for a quick infusion of cash to “help elect Sebelius and Morrison?”
Since Tiller’s ProKanDo PAC represented itself to its donors as a vehicle to elect Sebelius and Morrison (even though not a single dollar appears as direct donations to either politician); would it not make sense that Sebelius would give him a taxpayer funded thank you for the roughly $800,000 that ProKanDo spent in that election cycle.
And of course he pumped in another $400,000 in mailings through Kansans for Consumer Privacy( I think that was the right name for the advocacy group- though they change names with such frequency.) If Tiller’s ProKanDo PAC tells its own donors that it is pumping money into Sebelius and Morrison, even though it tells a different story to state regulators, shouldn’t we assume that the mythical auction donation for six was not related to the feast for 20 that feted Tiller?

Jeffrey

Update: If Gov. Sebelius made the donations personally to the Greater KC Women's Political Caucus, and NOT part of her campaign or her Bluestem PAC, then there is no ethics issue.